0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ±ÝÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °£È£»çÀÇ ÀνÄ

Nurse¡¯s Perception on Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

ÁßȯÀÚ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 4±Ç 1È£ p.11 ~ 24
KMID : 1221920110040010011
Á¶Á¤¸² ( Cho Jeong-Lim ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÀÌÀº³² ( Lee Eun-Nam ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
º¯¼÷Áø ( Byun Sook-Jin ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ÀÇ·á¿ø ½ÉÀåÁßȯÀÚ½Ç

Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to grasp the subjectivity of the nurses toward DNR (Do not resuscitation) order.

Methods:Q methodology was employed to explore the nurses¡¯ subjectivity. Q population consisted of 292 statements that were obtained through individual in-depth interviews targeting 30 employees(nurses, doctors, staff members) and literature review. Finally, 30 nurses classified 34 statements using a 9 point scale.

Results:The current survey that probed into the subjectivity of the nurses relative to DNR order abstracted four categories. The first type (restrictive acceptance type) perceived the determinants of DNR as the patient¡¯s hopeless state. The second type (evidence-based type) emphasized the decision based on the guideline. The third type (medical personnel-centered type) showed the characteristic that depends passively on the professional judgement. The fourth type (rationalistic type) emphasized rational characteristic that DNR decision needs to be made by considering several situations such as economic and psychological burden of family and the quality of life.

Conclusion:These types of nurse¡¯s perception need to be considered in the nurses¡¯ continuing educational program in order to confront affirmatively and positively with ethical dilemma.
KeyWords
½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ±ÝÁö, °£È£»ç, ÀνÄ
Resuscitation orders, Nurses, Perception
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)